Throughout the background of Western culture, art, viewpoint, and modern technology have constantly preserved a complex connection with reality and exists. Oscar Wilde, in The Decay of Resting, had actually currently anticipated that art ought to not serve reality or copy nature, but instead create truths that release us from the worry of immediate fact. Throughout the 20 th century, this relationship was tensioned and expanded, specifically with the contributions of Marshall McLuhan and Jean Baudrillard, that placed modern technologies and media at the center of the issue, highlighting just how they reconfigure not only the means of seeing the world yet the actual world that happens viewed.
Today, in a digital society marked by mathematical platforms, hyper-imagetic stimuli, and viralized incorrect stories, we observe a sensation that I call the cumulative lie: a set of symbolic, social, and technical frameworks that develop themselves as truths not by their communication to reality yet by rep and social acceptance. These naturalized lies come to be unseen and structuring components of everyday experience.
This essay recommends that the relationship in between lies and truth operates in a continual dialectical procedure, which can only be cut off or shifted by the imaginative treatment of the mindful musician, instructor, or technologist. This treatment takes the kind of the anti-environment, a principle influenced by McLuhan’s appearances, as a tear that makes noticeable what had been naturalized.
The honorable lie and the liberating gesture in Oscar Wilde
Oscar Wilde recognizes art as an area for the noble lie. His rejection of realism is not mere quirk however a philosophical stance: by mimicing nature, art relinquishes its transformative capacity. In The Degeneration of Resting, Wilde states that it is through the lie (creation, distortion, and production) that human beings increase their sensitivity and peek new facts.
Wilde’s famous expression sums up the significance of his placement: “Life mimics art even more than art copies life.” By stating this, Wilde overturns the traditional reasoning of art as a mirror of the world and proposes that it is life itself that involves duplicate the fictions, aesthetic appeals, and forms developed by art. Therefore, the visual lie not only frees yet develops environments that, gradually, shape the extremely social experience.
For Wilde, reality, understood as integrity to empirical reality, is an aesthetic and existential limitation. The artist, by developing from the lie, rearranges the noticeable and therefore likewise changes what we recognize as genuine. This procedure creates what we could call critical perception: the shock in the face of the unexpected and the pictured breaks the inertia of daily experience and opens us to new opportunities of significance.
Innovation and unnoticeable naturalization according to McLuhan
Marshall McLuhan increases the issue by placing technology right into the formula. If Wilde believed in the field of art, McLuhan understands that innovations and communication media are today the excellent makers of atmospheres, which become unseen through knowledge. “The fish does not understand it stays in water”; so it is with human beings before technically constructed environments.
The function of the musician, according to McLuhan, is exactly to be the one that, getting on the sides of society, can see the atmosphere and, with their work, produce an anti-environment; a disturbance, a comparison, an artifice that reveals the undetectable medium. The musician, therefore, meets a fundamental social role: reestablishing important understanding right into a culture immersed in automated and naturalized settings.
Baudrillard and the period of simulacra
If for Wilde the creative lie was liberating and for McLuhan the technological environment can be knocked by the musician, Baudrillard takes the issue to the extreme by proposing that we no longer reside in natural or imaginative environments however in simulacra, that is, in artificial realities that have actually come to be tantamount from the actual.
The simulacrum is the victory of the lie that no more demands to camouflage itself, as it is approved as genuine by the pressure of repetition, aesthetics, and performance. Hyper-reality (a reality saturated with signs and images) dissolves the distinction in between lie and reality, and objection loses its stamina, as the general public has currently adjusted to this long-term state of simulation.
The cumulative lie as an unnoticeable setting
From this academic practice, we can affirm that the cumulative lie contains the stablizing of simulacra and artificial atmospheres that, when naturalized, end up being structuring aspects of social life. When these lies gain social body (institutionalised, mediatized, and incorporated right into technical logics) they discontinue to be viewed as constructions and happen the world as it is.
The cumulative lie today operates with unmatched performance, driven by algorithms, referral systems, details bubbles, and artificial intelligences that strengthen beliefs, reinforce false narratives, and reduce dissent. Important assumption becomes progressively uncommon since the setting ends up being unseen and comfortable, even if oppressive. Today’s collective lie does not impose itself via repression however with algorithmic softness. It is Byung-Chul Han’s coercive positivity: bubbles of confirmation that eliminate the other and reduce dissent to noise. In the desert of difference, the lie acclimates itself as convenience.
Does a lie get combated with the truth?
The concern seems easy, virtually automated: Does a lie obtain combated with the fact? The instinctive response would certainly be to affirm indeed — that every lie must be fixed by revealing the reality. Nevertheless, this statement, although comforting, overlooks the much more refined characteristics of the lie when it has currently changed right into an atmosphere The cumulative lie, once naturalized, is no more just a false statement; it is a sensitive landscape, an affective area, and a way of life. Its strength does not lie in isolated fraud but in its day-to-day invisibility.
Wilde, by protecting that “Life copies art far more than art mimics life,” currently anticipated that fictions, once socially integrated, become perceptual matrices. McLuhan, subsequently, exposes that the technological and symbolic atmospheres we occupy (and that populate us) are undetected precisely because they are our essential medium. And Baudrillard radicalizes this problem by revealing us that we already reside in a hyper-real where the extremely comparison between fact and lie liquifies.
In this context, just opposing an accurate truth to the collective lie tends to fall short. It is insufficient to existing information, proper speeches, or offer evidence. Fact, to run as objection, have to initially be felt therefore. And this just occurs when the setting is denaturalized when the fish finally realizes it is inside the water, when it lastly sees the water.
Now, the principle of an anti-environment comes to be tactical: it develops a situation of contrast that reactivates important assumption, enabling the collective lie to be recognized as building and construction and not as fate.
Contemporary instances of anti-environments
The idea of anti-environment, when increased past typical art, verifies to be a powerful technique in different fields; from contemporary art to media education, from philosophical criticism to technological interventions. The anti-environment, in its essence, does not deny the leading atmosphere yet illuminates it, generating a comparison that makes its assumption and questioning feasible.
Functions such as the Black Mirror collection (Charlie Brooker) provide an exceptional example of an anti-environment. By predicting dystopias near our technological reality, the collection develops a warped mirror that extremely exposes the currently naturalized setting of modern electronic partnerships. Artists like Banksy or Eduardo Srur, through metropolitan treatments, create discomfort by changing public area right into a wondering about circumstance.
Media literacy efforts, such as the Media Literacy programs established by UNESCO, accomplish the function of producing cognitive anti-environments. By instructing students and man in the streets to critically examine the structure of media stories, the functioning of algorithms, and the characteristics of fake information, these programs do not merely existing data or fact-checks. Their feature is to reconfigure the gaze, allowing the based on regard the informative setting that formerly appeared neutral or inescapable.
Engineers and important designers can additionally function as anti-environment representatives. Tasks such as the Data Detoxification Package, developed by Tactical Technology, provide users with tools to concretely perceive how their personal information is gathered, examined, and made use of. These tools do not directly fight hegemonic systems however expose their inner reasonings, allowing the individual to familiarize the unseen mathematical environment.
In viewpoint and the social scientific researches, writers like Zygmunt Bauman and Byung-Chul Han produce theoretical anti-environments. Their messages do not use clear-cut dishes or truths but instill a disruption in the visitor, forcing them to perceive the unseen atmospheres of their own every day lives.
Anti-environment and destabilization
The anti-environment, therefore, does not look for to supply an “objective truth” that will replace the collective lie however rather to establish an experience of estrangement that denaturalizes and reactivates the dialectic of truth/lie. What goes to stake is not so much knowing the fact yet regarding the setting and, with that said, having the ability to examine it.
This variation is especially crucial in the period of hyper-reality, where the excess of information and photos paradoxically hides the actual. The anti-environment hence has an extra visual and sensitive function than an effectively argumentative one. Its toughness hinges on reorganizing perception, provoking a tiny shock that undercuts certainties, breaking the ice for the subject to reintroduce questioning.
Seeing the water
The confrontation of the naturalization of the collective lie does not necessarily occur through the easy exposition of facts or attract unbiased reality. More reliable seems to be the aware creation of anti-environments. Whether in art, education and learning, or modern technology, the anti-environment work as an important device that makes the undetectable visible, reveals naturalized lies, and reinstates the area for questioning. This strategy does not aim to replace the lie with an intended definitive reality but to provoke the required comparison for people to recognize that the present setting is simply a provisionary configuration and, therefore, based on objection and transformation.
As McLuhan recommends, we need to act on the sides, like fish that, for a split second, see the water and invite others to acknowledge it.
Extra on cumulative lie: